Cora Dyce

Welcome to our website !
Please register an account to view the complete categories and forums.


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Cora Dyce

Welcome to our website !
Please register an account to view the complete categories and forums.

Cora Dyce

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Cora Dyce - Your personal dicing clan


+15
Boofz
Joe
Dogs>Cats
स्वस्ति
Daft Punk
Slash
Bf
CM
G
The Uzumaki
Andrew
Firefury54
Rand al'Thor
Lelz
Jon
19 posters

    If you enjoy maths:

    Jon
    Jon
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 13685
    Join date : 2011-09-19
    Age : 27
    Location : United Kingdom

    Dices Rolls
    Dice Roll:

    If you enjoy maths: Empty If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Jon 2013-10-27, 15:23

    A friend just proved to me that 0.9 recurring is equal to 1.

    x = 0.99999...
    ∴ 10x = 9.99999...
    9x = 10x - x
    ∴ 9x = 9.99999... - 0.99999...
    ∴ 9x = 9
    ∴ x = 1

    Therefore proving that there must be an end to an infinite amount of digits. My mind has been blown.
    Lelz
    Lelz
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 5464
    Join date : 2011-09-09
    Age : 28
    Location : Sean's house.

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Lelz 2013-10-27, 15:26

    2+2=5

    it's true

    someone proved it

    really

    ceck it.
    Rand al'Thor
    Rand al'Thor
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 6244
    Join date : 2012-01-02
    Age : 27
    Location : The Threefold Land

    Dices Rolls
    Dice Roll:

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Rand al'Thor 2013-10-27, 15:59

    I swear that is part of GCSE Razz

    There's also:
    1 = 0.3333333…
    3
    3 = 0.9999999…
    3
    ∴ 1 = 0.9999999…
    Firefury54
    Firefury54
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 4033
    Join date : 2012-06-24
    Age : 110
    Location : United States

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Firefury54 2013-10-27, 16:52

    Jon wrote:A friend just proved to me that 0.9 recurring is equal to 1.

    x = 0.99999...
    ∴ 10x = 9.99999...
    9x = 10x - x
    ∴ 9x = 9.99999... - 0.99999...
    ∴ 9x = 9
    ∴ x = 1

    Therefore proving that there must be an end to an infinite amount of digits. My mind has been blown.
    Your error lies in the fact that you are trying to find x when you already know the answer. In actuality, the equation you used would progress as follows:

    9x = 10x - x
    9x = 9x
    x = 1

    Therefore, x would have been 1 regardless of you plugging in an arbitrary number for just 2 out of 3 x's (which fails to follow any mathematical rationale.). Tell your friend to forfeit his manhood and go back to the 5th grade.


    Rand al'Thor wrote:I swear that is part of GCSE Razz

    There's also:
    1 = 0.3333333…
    3
    3 = 0.9999999…
    3
    ∴ 1 = 0.9999999…
    This, on the other hand, is a valid mathematical proof ... *mind blown*
    Andrew
    Andrew
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 5628
    Join date : 2011-07-01
    Age : 31
    Location : Connecticut

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Andrew 2013-10-27, 16:58

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem
    avatar
    The Uzumaki
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 9689
    Join date : 2011-08-12
    Age : 28
    Location : Malaysia

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by The Uzumaki 2013-10-27, 17:11

    Firefury54 wrote:
    Jon wrote:A friend just proved to me that 0.9 recurring is equal to 1.

    x = 0.99999...
    ∴ 10x = 9.99999...
    9x = 10x - x
    ∴ 9x = 9.99999... - 0.99999...
    ∴ 9x = 9
    ∴ x = 1

    Therefore proving that there must be an end to an infinite amount of digits. My mind has been blown.
    Your error lies in the fact that you are trying to find x when you already know the answer. In actuality, the equation you used would progress as follows:

    9x = 10x - x
    9x = 9x
    x = 1

    Therefore, x would have been 1 regardless of you plugging in an arbitrary number for just 2 out of 3 x's (which fails to follow any mathematical rationale.). Tell your friend to forfeit his manhood and go back to the 5th grade.


    Rand al'Thor wrote:I swear that is part of GCSE Razz

    There's also:
    1 = 0.3333333…
    3
    3 = 0.9999999…
    3
    ∴ 1 = 0.9999999…
    This, on the other hand, is a valid mathematical proof ... *mind blown*
    That was....


    Simply beautiful
    G
    G
    Highroller
    Highroller


    Posts : 10394
    Join date : 2011-07-05
    Age : 24
    Location : DM

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by G 2013-10-27, 17:28

    11+1=12
    CM
    CM
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 4530
    Join date : 2012-03-29
    Location : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB6ueuLb8Gc

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by CM 2013-10-27, 18:05

    Over Living wrote:11+1=12
    And 12-1=11    o.O

    11-1=10
    10-1=9

    11-9=2

    11-9=
    11-9
    9-11 OOOO.oooo

    Jon
    Jon
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 13685
    Join date : 2011-09-19
    Age : 27
    Location : United Kingdom

    Dices Rolls
    Dice Roll:

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Jon 2013-10-27, 19:07

    Firefury54 wrote:
    Jon wrote:A friend just proved to me that 0.9 recurring is equal to 1.

    x = 0.99999...
    ∴ 10x = 9.99999...
    9x = 10x - x
    ∴ 9x = 9.99999... - 0.99999...
    ∴ 9x = 9
    ∴ x = 1

    Therefore proving that there must be an end to an infinite amount of digits. My mind has been blown.
    Your error lies in the fact that you are trying to find x when you already know the answer. In actuality, the equation you used would progress as follows:

    9x = 10x - x
    9x = 9x
    x = 1

    Therefore, x would have been 1 regardless of you plugging in an arbitrary number for just 2 out of 3 x's (which fails to follow any mathematical rationale.). Tell your friend to forfeit his manhood and go back to the 5th grade.


    Rand al'Thor wrote:I swear that is part of GCSE Razz

    There's also:
    1 = 0.3333333…
    3
    3 = 0.9999999…
    3
    ∴ 1 = 0.9999999…
    This, on the other hand, is a valid mathematical proof ... *mind blown*
    ummm... that is valid proof.
    Bf
    Bf
    Honorary Member
    Honorary Member


    Posts : 6451
    Join date : 2011-05-24
    Age : 20
    Location : Majed's room in Sam's house

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Bf 2013-10-27, 19:43

    Lol, I remember learning this in Calc senior year. #mindblown
    Slash
    Slash
    Global Mod
    Global Mod


    Posts : 10756
    Join date : 2012-04-01
    Age : 27
    Location : Ali's computer

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Slash 2013-10-27, 20:12

    Fuck me sideways
    Daft Punk
    Daft Punk
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 3818
    Join date : 2012-04-05
    Age : 31
    Location : California, USA

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Daft Punk 2013-10-27, 20:34

    A friend of mine proved that 9 = 5 using i in a formula. Our calculus professor couldn't explain why it didn't work. I'll see if I can have him send it to me, its a lot to do with how i is cyclical, but i don't remember it exactly.
    Firefury54
    Firefury54
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 4033
    Join date : 2012-06-24
    Age : 110
    Location : United States

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Firefury54 2013-10-27, 20:54

    Jon wrote:
    Firefury54 wrote:
    Jon wrote:A friend just proved to me that 0.9 recurring is equal to 1.

    x = 0.99999...
    ∴ 10x = 9.99999...
    9x = 10x - x
    ∴ 9x = 9.99999... - 0.99999...
    ∴ 9x = 9
    ∴ x = 1

    Therefore proving that there must be an end to an infinite amount of digits. My mind has been blown.
    Your error lies in the fact that you are trying to find x when you already know the answer. In actuality, the equation you used would progress as follows:

    9x = 10x - x
    9x = 9x
    x = 1

    Therefore, x would have been 1 regardless of you plugging in an arbitrary number for just 2 out of 3 x's (which fails to follow any mathematical rationale.). Tell your friend to forfeit his manhood and go back to the 5th grade.


    Rand al'Thor wrote:I swear that is part of GCSE Razz

    There's also:
    1 = 0.3333333…
    3
    3 = 0.9999999…
    3
    ∴ 1 = 0.9999999…
    This, on the other hand, is a valid mathematical proof ... *mind blown*
    ummm... that is valid proof.

    Then maybe you care to enlighten me because I still fail to see how this is a valid proof. Even if we played it out the way you explained it; it doesn't make sense. Let me begin from where the misunderstanding was identified:

    9x = 10x - x
    x = 0.99999...
    9(0.999...) = 10(0.999...) - (0.999...)
    8.999... = 9.999 ... - 0.999 ....
    8.999... ≠ 9

    This is why your proof doesn't make sense to me. You cannot simply plug in a predetermined value for x for a part of the equation and not the rest ... Why would you solve for "x" when you already decided to use 0.999 ... for x? While it is highly likely that there is a valid proof for your statement, it was not confirmed with the proof your friend used.
    Jon
    Jon
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 13685
    Join date : 2011-09-19
    Age : 27
    Location : United Kingdom

    Dices Rolls
    Dice Roll:

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Jon 2013-10-27, 20:58

    Firefury54 wrote:
    Jon wrote:
    Firefury54 wrote:
    Jon wrote:A friend just proved to me that 0.9 recurring is equal to 1.

    x = 0.99999...
    ∴ 10x = 9.99999...
    9x = 10x - x
    ∴ 9x = 9.99999... - 0.99999...
    ∴ 9x = 9
    ∴ x = 1

    Therefore proving that there must be an end to an infinite amount of digits. My mind has been blown.
    Your error lies in the fact that you are trying to find x when you already know the answer. In actuality, the equation you used would progress as follows:

    9x = 10x - x
    9x = 9x
    x = 1

    Therefore, x would have been 1 regardless of you plugging in an arbitrary number for just 2 out of 3 x's (which fails to follow any mathematical rationale.). Tell your friend to forfeit his manhood and go back to the 5th grade.


    Rand al'Thor wrote:I swear that is part of GCSE Razz

    There's also:
    1 = 0.3333333…
    3
    3 = 0.9999999…
    3
    ∴ 1 = 0.9999999…
    This, on the other hand, is a valid mathematical proof ... *mind blown*
    ummm... that is valid proof.

    Then maybe you care to enlighten me because I still fail to see how this is a valid proof. Even if we played it out the way you explained it; it doesn't make sense. Let me begin from where the misunderstanding was identified:

    9x = 10x - x
    x = 0.99999...
    9(0.999...) = 10(0.999...) - (0.999...)
    8.999... = 9.999 ... - 0.999 ....
    8.999... ≠ 9

    This is why your proof doesn't make sense to me. You cannot simply plug in a predetermined value for x for a part of the equation and not the rest ... Why would you solve for "x" when you already decided to use 0.999 ... for x? While it is highly likely that there is a valid proof for your statement, it was not confirmed with the proof your friend used.
    The value that I defined as x is 0.999...
    10x-x=9x
    10(0.999...)-0.999... = 9x = 9
    x=1

    Therefore x equals both 0.999... and 1. If 0.999... is equal to 1. Then they are the same. ie. They are equal. I don't know how I can possibly put it any simpler than that. It is proof.


    These are the first 4 results when I google'd: "0.999... = 1"
    If you enjoy maths: 599ab0eab6f0f884254e9bc3f93963cb
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999...

    If you enjoy maths: C22c0f63ec1849d5792cee781f7209a6
    http://www.purplemath.com/modules/howcan1.htm

    If you enjoy maths: 3a8bd131ddbdf5e1789ffc2d92274f86
    http://www.math.hmc.edu/funfacts/ffiles/10012.5.shtml

    If you enjoy maths: 14426cfe6d54131e201c8547aa426640
    http://www.mathsisfun.com/9recurring.html
    avatar
    स्वस्ति
    Member
    Member


    Posts : 133
    Join date : 2013-10-19

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by स्वस्ति 2013-10-27, 21:25

    This is why i think math is complete bullshit
    avatar
    The Uzumaki
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 9689
    Join date : 2011-08-12
    Age : 28
    Location : Malaysia

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by The Uzumaki 2013-10-27, 21:26

    स्वस्ति wrote:This is why i think math is complete bullshit
    Why did you delete the earlier post ngawwww
    avatar
    स्वस्ति
    Member
    Member


    Posts : 133
    Join date : 2013-10-19

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by स्वस्ति 2013-10-27, 21:27

    The Uzumaki wrote:
    स्वस्ति wrote:This is why i think math is complete bullshit
    Why did you delete the earlier post ngawwww
    that works the same:

    9x = 10x - x
    9x = 9x
    x = 1
    Firefury54
    Firefury54
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 4033
    Join date : 2012-06-24
    Age : 110
    Location : United States

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Firefury54 2013-10-27, 21:29

    Now, THAT is a valid proof. Thank you. You missed a step and had me confused Razz
    avatar
    The Uzumaki
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 9689
    Join date : 2011-08-12
    Age : 28
    Location : Malaysia

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by The Uzumaki 2013-10-27, 21:29

    स्वस्ति wrote:
    The Uzumaki wrote:
    स्वस्ति wrote:This is why i think math is complete bullshit
    Why did you delete the earlier post ngawwww
    that works the same:

    9x = 10x - x
    9x = 9x
    x = 1
    Lol the answer to that is

    1 = 1 

    Not x = 1

    Divide both sides by x
    Rand al'Thor
    Rand al'Thor
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 6244
    Join date : 2012-01-02
    Age : 27
    Location : The Threefold Land

    Dices Rolls
    Dice Roll:

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Rand al'Thor 2013-10-27, 21:34

    Daft Punk wrote:A friend of mine proved that 9 = 5 using i in a formula.  Our calculus professor couldn't explain why it didn't work.  I'll see if I can have him send it to me, its a lot to do with how i is cyclical, but i don't remember it exactly.
    My Chinese friend showed me this 'proof' using i:

    1 = 1½
       = (-1.-1)½
       = (-1)½(-1)½
       = i2
       = -1

    lol
    Jon
    Jon
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 13685
    Join date : 2011-09-19
    Age : 27
    Location : United Kingdom

    Dices Rolls
    Dice Roll:

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Jon 2013-10-27, 21:39

    Rand al'Thor wrote:
    Daft Punk wrote:A friend of mine proved that 9 = 5 using i in a formula.  Our calculus professor couldn't explain why it didn't work.  I'll see if I can have him send it to me, its a lot to do with how i is cyclical, but i don't remember it exactly.
    My Chinese friend showed me this 'proof' using i:

    1 = 1½
       = (-1.-1)½
       = (-1)½(-1)½
       = i2
       = -1

    lol
    -1 < 9u²
    avatar
    स्वस्ति
    Member
    Member


    Posts : 133
    Join date : 2013-10-19

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by स्वस्ति 2013-10-27, 21:46

    This one is also making my head hurt: 1=2


    a = b.

    a + a = a + b

    2 x a = a + b.

    2 x a × a = a x (a + b)

    2 x a x a = a x a + a x b.

    2 x a x a - 2 x a x b = a x a - a x b.

    2 x (a x a - a × b) = a x a - a x b.

    let's say: c = a × a - a × b:

    2 × c = c.

    so:

    2 = 1.
    Rand al'Thor
    Rand al'Thor
    VIP
    VIP


    Posts : 6244
    Join date : 2012-01-02
    Age : 27
    Location : The Threefold Land

    Dices Rolls
    Dice Roll:

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Rand al'Thor 2013-10-27, 21:49

    स्वस्ति wrote:This one is also making my head hurt: 1=2


    a = b.

    a + a = a + b

    2 x a = a + b.

    2 x a × a = a x (a + b)

    2 x a x a = a x a + a x b.

    2 x a x a - 2 x a x b = a x a - a x b.

    2 x (a x a - a × b) = a x a - a x b.

    let's say: c = a × a - a × b:

    2 × c = c.

    so:

    2 = 1.
    let's say: c = a × a - a × b:
    then, c = 0

    2 × c = c.

    so:

    2 = 1.


    And you cannot divide by zero :c
    avatar
    स्वस्ति
    Member
    Member


    Posts : 133
    Join date : 2013-10-19

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by स्वस्ति 2013-10-27, 22:08

    Yes rand!

    Ok now without looking it up try this one (don't post the answer, it's quite tricky):

    3 guys go to rent a motel room for the night , the desk clerk informs them it will be $30 dollars for the night. They agree and split the cost at $10 per person. The men check into their room and 30 minutes later, the desk clerk realizes that he charged them $5 too much, he sends the bellboy up to the room with 5 -$1 dollars bills as their rebate for overpayment. The men cannot agree on how to evenly split the $5 bucks, one guy suggests that they each take a dollar back and tip the bellboy $2 bucks for bringing it up to them.

    Now we come to premise; which leaves each one of the guys paying $9 dollars each for the room; now, if 9x3=27 and they gave the bellboy a $2 dollar tip; bringing the total to 29; where did the other dollar go?
    CM
    CM
    Sponsor
    Sponsor


    Posts : 4530
    Join date : 2012-03-29
    Location : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB6ueuLb8Gc

    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by CM 2013-10-27, 22:11

    Got through cal 1 senior year with the help of an Asian friend. Seriously.

    Sponsored content


    If you enjoy maths: Empty Re: If you enjoy maths:

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is 2024-05-09, 09:24