How I Changed 8M Into 540M Within 4 Hours

Hello everyone,

So what I did was.. I wanted to test out the technique some may know (1-2-4-8...) for those that don't know, if you take those numbers multiply them by any amount..

For example:

I started with 8m, so I multiplied each by 1m. so if I plug it in 1m-2m-4m-8m...
now to ensure I don't lose anything.. unless of course I'm very unlucky if I win a 1m wager I don't go higher, rather I go to back to my initial amount of 1m. now say I lose this time I double it.. so now I do 2m, and if I win back to 1m, if not up to 4.

Logic of this Method:

If I were to win a 1m wager, I'd have an 800k profit gain (hosts get their 10% commission). Now if I were do lose I'd have a 1m loss so now I go to 2m, if I win I'd have a 1600k gain, so from that 1m I previously lost, I'd be up 600k! now if I lose.. I'd do a 4m
keeping in mind I've lost 1m + 2m = 3m.. if I were to win a 4m, I'd get 3200k profit, subtract the 3m, you're still up 200k.

So in the long run it's very effective, just takes patience, also dicing is no fun with out a few big wagers, so yeah take that risk as well, but this is for those who are patient and tired of losing money.

On the following table the initial amount includes the the amount from the previous bets as well, the *(insert amt.)* is the amount bet during that trial.

A table of the values.

Initial Amount | Commission(10%) | Profit

1M |200k (2M pot)| 800k
1M + *2M* |400k (4M pot)| 600k
1M + 2M + *4M* |800k (8M pot)| 200k
1M + 2M + 4M + *8M* |1600k (16M pot)| -400k (fourth loss is very unlikely, possible yes, but here's where it
goes downhill)


Take care,

Host Phd.

Thanks for the guide! Congrats on the gp

Only problem with snowballing in commission based games is that after the 3rd loss, the money taken out through commission keeps you negative.

if the 3r dtime is 8m, you've lost 6m previously..(2m + 4m) so now if you do an 8m which is um 1600k commission you get 14.6M from the host now if you add this together, 8m + 2m + 4m = 14M, you're sitll up 600k. say you lose a 4th time, which isn't probable.. but now you start losing a little.. then you do a 16.. which is 3.2m comission = 29.8M from the host if you win, now if you add it all together.. 16m + 8m +4m + 2m = 30M, down 200k, so by the 4th yeah you'll lose money, but losing 4 times in a row has never happened to me.. possible yes, likely not so much.

Host Phd wrote:if the 3r dtime is 8m, you've lost 6m previously..(2m + 4m) so now if you do an 8m which is um 1600k commission you get 14.6M from the host now if you add this together, 8m + 2m + 4m = 14M, you're sitll up 600k. say you lose a 4th time, which isn't probable.. but now you start losing a little.. then you do a 16.. which is 3.2m comission = 29.8M from the host if you win, now if you add it all together.. 16m + 8m +4m + 2m = 30M, down 200k, so by the 4th yeah you'll lose money, but losing 4 times in a row has never happened to me.. possible yes, likely not so much.

I tried this with 12m and got bored and bet it all and lost ^^

ill try this tommorow

other problem is if u lose all 1m 2m 4m 8m then u have no choice but to do a 15m bet or 16m to gain all ur money back lol then start all over x] but i also figured this method out takes some luck though if u lose 4 in a row bummer x]

This method only works effectively in 55x2 or 60x2 clans because you can theoretically double forever.

Pretty Decent Guide even though i cant understand some parts of it :0

If I did this I would lose all of them in a row...

Is this guide mostly relying on luck because you never know if your just gonna lose everything.

Dragon Mp wrote:Is this guide mostly relying on luck because you never know if your just gonna lose everything.

This guide is so you don't rely as much on luck and so you have better chances of not losing it all.

o ok... So basically giving you a better chance of winning?

its pretty much increases ur chances of winning with out that much luck needed

sponge bo272 wrote:its pretty much increases ur chances of winning with out that much luck needed

kk thanks for the clarification.

A lot of people do this staking.
I did the math for doing this while dicing 60x2, you had a 1/33 chance of getting cleaned (If you have ~250m, meaning you can lose 8 times before getting cleaned) After you did this 33 times, you'd probably get cleaned.
The likelyhood of getting cleaned doing this is probably probably just slightly lower. Not worth it.

When you snowball, it's the same probability that you'll gain/lose the same as regular wagering.

Barbecued wrote:When you snowball, it's the same probability that you'll gain/lose the same as regular wagering.

This is actually not true. When you snowball, you basically give yourself more chances to win. In dice duel, this is limited to four "doubles" due to the commission. However, in 55x2 or 60x2, this is different as you can theoretically "double" an infinite amount of times, provided you had the money to do so. So to sum it up, in 55x2 or 60x2, if you had a near infinite amount of money, you'd have a nearly 100% chance of winning.

qrooltex wrote:

Barbecued wrote:When you snowball, it's the same probability that you'll gain/lose the same as regular wagering.

This is actually not true. When you snowball, you basically give yourself more chances to win. In dice duel, this is limited to four "doubles" due to the commission. However, in 55x2 or 60x2, this is different as you can theoretically "double" an infinite amount of times, provided you had the money to do so. So to sum it up, in 55x2 or 60x2, if you had a near infinite amount of money, you'd have a nearly 100% chance of winning.

Yeah but its too bad most of the people snowballing dont have a near infinite amount of money.

Mr M Esaibid wrote:

qrooltex wrote:

Barbecued wrote:When you snowball, it's the same probability that you'll gain/lose the same as regular wagering.

This is actually not true. When you snowball, you basically give yourself more chances to win. In dice duel, this is limited to four "doubles" due to the commission. However, in 55x2 or 60x2, this is different as you can theoretically "double" an infinite amount of times, provided you had the money to do so. So to sum it up, in 55x2 or 60x2, if you had a near infinite amount of money, you'd have a nearly 100% chance of winning.

Yeah but its too bad most of the people snowballing dont have a near infinite amount of money.

Well you really don't need a near infinite amount of money to lower your chances of losing money to <0.01%. In the end, it all comes down to how much money you want to make, higher being more risky.

Host Phd wrote:How I Changed 8M Into 540M Within 4 Hours

If this is true, you were very lucky. Congrats.

This is how i got cleaned lol.

Host Panda wrote:This is how i got cleaned lol.

^ This is what usually will happen.

nice money making, but i have done this and lost all times lol

I have also thought this way:)