Rf 500m superman pls and thx

Twas the day I had 1b in the lovely Coradyce IRC. The bot went out when I had 500m left. SOOOO "Host_Jojo" comes on and lets me do debt bets with exidor another host. But exidor and jojo were both nat4334. So i was getting fucked by 2 hosts that werent a host. So basically, I was betting against a host that had no money, and the hosting host had no money to pay out. If that made no sense @ all write wat made no sense and ill explain what I ment.







So, in that case. I would like my rf please and thank you.

vouch

if ur hoping to pull a howski and get funded by myself and inva, fat chance

Just saying, I was there and can vouch this happened lol.

you got scammed, the host wouldn't refund you, stop crying. Has happened many times in the past lol

what if you won all the debt bets? you are just mad because you lost

To pants if I had won I still would've gotten scammed. Jojo had no money

Lol this thread doesn't mean dog shit. Alright first off you lost the bets and that's all there is to it, do you have downs? lol jk xd Plus I wouldn't exactly hold Andy accountable for your personal debt bets even if they were hosts you have to take into consideration that they'd scam.

how do you know he had no money
with proof

Exidor was also Purple Man for a good while

G wrote:Lol this thread doesn't mean dog shit. Alright first off you lost the bets and that's all there is to it, do you have downs? lol jk xd Plus I wouldn't exactly hold Andy accountable for your personal debt bets even if they were hosts you have to take into consideration that they'd scam.

Im not supposed to be able to trust hosts?

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

cuz he was a host and the benefit of the doubt is that he has money

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

cuz he was a host and the benefit of the doubt is that he has money

He's also supposed to be the person the rank got given to. Was that the case?

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

cuz he was a host and the benefit of the doubt is that he has money

He's also supposed to be the person the rank got given to. Was that the case?

You need the to prove any of them would have scammed you. 

the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (you) as well as the burden of proof he would have scammed if you won (which you can't because it would all be speculation)


edit btw u still didnt respond to the post you just posted a superficial comment

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

cuz he was a host and the benefit of the doubt is that he has money

He's also supposed to be the person the rank got given to. Was that the case?

You need the to prove any of them would have scammed you. 

the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (you) as well as the burden of proof he would have scammed if you won (which you can't because it would all be speculation)

They got deranked for fucking me in the ass. Becos the got deranked for that I'm supposed to get a refund. I got fucked in the ass by 2 hosts that werent actually hosts that were the same person.

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

cuz he was a host and the benefit of the doubt is that he has money

He's also supposed to be the person the rank got given to. Was that the case?

You need the to prove any of them would have scammed you. 

the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (you) as well as the burden of proof he would have scammed if you won (which you can't because it would all be speculation)

They got deranked for fucking me in the ass. Becos the got deranked for that I'm supposed to get a refund. I got fucked in the ass by 2 hosts that werent actually hosts that were the same person.

They were not deranked for anything relating to you. 
so prove they would have scammed you

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

cuz he was a host and the benefit of the doubt is that he has money

He's also supposed to be the person the rank got given to. Was that the case?

You need the to prove any of them would have scammed you. 

the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (you) as well as the burden of proof he would have scammed if you won (which you can't because it would all be speculation)

They got deranked for fucking me in the ass. Becos the got deranked for that I'm supposed to get a refund. I got fucked in the ass by 2 hosts that werent actually hosts that were the same person.

They were not deranked for anything relating to you. 
so prove they would have scammed you

They were'nt deranked due to anything related to me? RU FUCKING STUPID? THEY GOT DERANKED FOR ACCOUNT SHARING? AND THATS WHAT THE FUCKED ME IN THE ASS WITH. AND BTW UNBAN THE FUCKING LINK THE IRC SO PEOPLE CAN VOICE THEIR OPINIONS.

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:how do you know he had no money
with proof

How do you know he had money?

cuz he was a host and the benefit of the doubt is that he has money

He's also supposed to be the person the rank got given to. Was that the case?

You need the to prove any of them would have scammed you. 

the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (you) as well as the burden of proof he would have scammed if you won (which you can't because it would all be speculation)

They got deranked for fucking me in the ass. Becos the got deranked for that I'm supposed to get a refund. I got fucked in the ass by 2 hosts that werent actually hosts that were the same person.

They were not deranked for anything relating to you. 
so prove they would have scammed you

They were'nt deranked due to anything related to me? RU FUCKING STUPID? THEY GOT DERANKED FOR ACCOUNT SHARING? AND THATS WHAT THE FUCKED ME IN THE ASS WITH. AND BTW UNBAN THE FUCKING LINK THE IRC SO PEOPLE CAN VOICE THEIR OPINIONS.

For all we know the real jojo and real exidor or w/e were using the accounts at the time. so that is another thing for you to prove. you also need to address the fact that there is no proof that they would have scammed you.

and the link ban was mostly for rock since he kept trying to argue with you in the irc

Inva a trusted admin knows that nat was on the acc. Ur just getting proved wrong everytime so you just abuse your powers and ban the link and shit.

Superman wrote:Inva a trusted admin knows that nat was on the acc. Ur just getting proved wrong everytime so you just abuse your powers and ban the link and shit.

prove nat would have scammed you if you had won the bets

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:Inva a trusted admin knows that nat was on the acc. Ur just getting proved wrong everytime so you just abuse your powers and ban the link and shit.

prove nat would have scammed you if you had won the bets

Prove that he wouldnt of?

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:Inva a trusted admin knows that nat was on the acc. Ur just getting proved wrong everytime so you just abuse your powers and ban the link and shit.

prove nat would have scammed you if you had won the bets

Prove that he wouldnt of?

Burden of proof is on you since you are the plaintiff.

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:

Dogs>Cats wrote:

Superman wrote:Inva a trusted admin knows that nat was on the acc. Ur just getting proved wrong everytime so you just abuse your powers and ban the link and shit.

prove nat would have scammed you if you had won the bets

Prove that he wouldnt of?

Burden of proof is on you since you are the plaintiff.

Im correct until proven guilty by this sites shitty judges.