Zodz wrote:as unacceptable as it may be to you. that's just the way it is.
you might as well be saying "as much as you don't approve of us scamming, that's the way we operate these days."
Zodz wrote:maybe u guys can group up and revolt
you're actually suggesting that we revolt against Andy?...
Zodz wrote:or at least convince him that Howski was right to only make dispute threads
Of course he was. He's trying to claim money that belongs to him.
Zodz wrote:try to claim currently non-existent money months too late
you're neglecting to acknowledge that Howski has been trying for months to get through to Andy. Maybe if he was more active then this could have been resolved when he still had access to the logs. Additionally, it shouldn't matter how long you keep your money in cora's credits. They should always be available for the customer to cash out on demand. If I cashed in my gp now then I would expect to still be able to have access to them months from now. There has never been a post implying that if you go inactive for a short time then cora dyce has the right to seize your credits.
Zodz wrote:when all evidence is already not available.
That's your problem then. If you can't prove that it doesn't belong to him and he's saying that it does then we have to assume that it does until we can say otherwise. It was never announced that cora poker was closing. The correct thing to have done would have been to make an announcement saying something along the lines of "Cora Poker will be shutting down in 1 month (for example) in that time you must cash out all of your credits. If you fail to do so then the credits will be lost."
Zodz wrote:An equal scenario to this is the fact that Award had poker cashin of 16m which remains unpaid via that same evidence which is now gone.
which I was, and still are entitled to, but which I'm happy to leave with Andy since 16m is not worth the hassle for me. Me being happy to be scammed does not mean that every customer will be.
Zodz wrote:IF howski denied using more than 1 account, and yet he will now agree to using 3 (hosting account, betting account, and the bbb imposter)
I believe Howski has denied ever having had a bbb imposter account and unless you're prepared to provide evidence to the contrary then we can only assume that you're being slanderous. I also can't recall Howski ever having a hosting account. (correct me if I'm wrong) Though to be honest it's completely irrelevant as to whether or not he did.
Zodz wrote:whos to say evidence wouldn't also reveal he also played freeroll games?
Again, this is entirely speculation and unless you can find evidence that he did, we must assume that he did not.
Zodz wrote:There is no case here. The dispute thread is conveniently months too late.
You're completely wrong. You have no case here. The money is Howski's until you can prove otherwise and you can't possibly use the lateness of this dispute as your own argument. That fault lies with Andy for being so absent. If he had not been then this may have been far easier to resolve.