Just a suggestion.

Flaws:

1 gp bet = .1 (4gp), < .2 (2gp)*, .7 (0gp)

*If bot guesses 1 or 10, it is a .2 chance at winning anything.

Those odds of winning are shit. I would crank out the expected results over time, but it's 4am.

This game would be a host verse player game...I think what we are going for is player verse player games.

Just realized how easy it was to do math (although I might have been too tired to function):

Betting 10m in 1m increments over time (theoretical)-- You lose 7 bets for (-7m), You win 2 bets (+1m x2), You win one bet (+3m).

Doing the above will net you a huge loss over time (not to mention the 1 and 10 problem.

stop banning Sam wrote:Flaws:

1 gp bet = .1 (4gp), < .2 (2gp)*, .7 (0gp)

*If bot guesses 1 or 10, it is a .2 chance at winning anything.

Those odds of winning are shit. I would crank out the expected results over time, but it's 4am.

Just use the expected value function.

P(x)(X)

0.1 times 4 + 0.2 times 2 + 0.7 times 0 = 0.8

That's for any case where 2-9 is picked.

0.1 times 4+ 0.2 times 1+0.7 times 0= 0.6

0.8 times 0.8+0.6 times 0.2=0.76

What that means is if you pool'd in the stats of everyone who played this game, you'd end up with a 0.76:1 ratio. E.g. Each bet renders 0.76x, x being what you bet. Standard deviation of 0.08433.

Short and sweet - Game's not in the better's favor.. by a long shot.

Holy mother of calculations. Last time I post an idea

Extremeflame wrote:Holy mother of calculations. Last time I post an idea

Noo haha, I like the concept; it just needs a little bit of tweeking so the house doesn't win as much as it's expected to.

If the concept is good let me make a alteration in the idea.

Suppose the bot generates 5.
Then if better guesses 5 he gets 4x
If better guessed 4 or 6 he gets 2x
If better guesses 3 or 7 he gets rf.

Cora dyce stick's to commission type games.