Guide to change 10m -> to 200m.

10m to 200m, or more. This tactique is called "SnowBalling" on 60x2. It has some riskes, but they are very small if you follow this guide.

Requirements: 10m, LEGIT dice cc and this guide.

How to do it?: Start with 10m in your inventory. Go to Legit dice cc area (example. Cora Dyce), and find a trusted host. Bet him/her 500k. If you win, repeat. If you lose, bet 1m. If you lose again, bet 2m, and so on... Risk should be small. You can also bet 250k at the beginning, if you want to make the risk less.
When you reach 20m, change that 250k bet to 500k, or 500k bet to 1m. Everytime you lose, double/1,5x your bet. It's very rare to lose all cash. At 40m cashpile, make your bet bigger. Every time your cashpile rises, you can bet more. This works approx for 9/10 ppl. You can stop in 200m, or you can just keep going, your choice.

Regards, Luke

It isnt 'very rare' to lose all your money. It happens to many people everyday. Nice theory tho

Dragonwheel wrote:It isnt 'very rare' to lose all your money. It happens to many people everyday. Nice theory tho

It is rare if you follow this guide.

Regards, Luke

Host Luke wrote:

Dragonwheel wrote:It isnt 'very rare' to lose all your money. It happens to many people everyday. Nice theory tho

It is rare if you follow this guide.

Regards, Luke

do you have 200m from this?

Dragonwheel wrote:

Host Luke wrote:

Dragonwheel wrote:It isnt 'very rare' to lose all your money. It happens to many people everyday. Nice theory tho

It is rare if you follow this guide.

Regards, Luke

do you have 200m from this?

Not anymore, I reached 500m with this. Lost it all in dragon dyce. Bank bet ftw?

Regards, Luke

so do you have any cash atm?

Just 6m.

Regards, Luke

I've already shown how this method fails.

Trevmage wrote:I've hosted 60x2 since February.... and this is called progressive betting. It usually benefits the better. But when it benefits the host, it benefits the host a lot.

If you have 127m and were to bet 1m, 2m, 4m, 8m, 16m, 32m, 64m (I'm doing double-bet instead of triple-bet for simplicity's sake) then this is basically what you would get if the odds are 60x2:


Odds of you winning: 97.51135%
How much you win: 1m

Odds of host winning: 2.48865%
How much host wins: 127m


Let's assume you are going to play until you win 127m from the host:
(97.51135%)^127 = 40.07386%

You have a 40.07386% chance of winning 127m before losing 127m by progressive betting.

Whereas if you just bet 127m once, you have a 41% chance of winning.


/strategy

And also, if you're going to do this in a wager cc instead of an x2 cc, you have to consider commission.

What happens when you bet:
1m (Lose)
2m (Lose)
4m (Lose)
8m (Lose)
16m (Lose)
32m (Win)
When you win the 32m, you must subtract the commission, which leaves you with +25.6m. Now subtract your previous losses (31m in total) you end up losing 5.4m.

This has been posted many times.

I was cleaned for 100m doing this, but that's because i got cocky .

The risk factor isn't that high, unless you're an idiot.

Dream wrote:This has been posted many times.

I was cleaned for 100m doing this, but that's because i got cocky .

The risk factor isn't that high, unless you're an idiot.

As I already showed... if you do this expecting to double your money, your odds are still only as good as if you just bet it all in one. Risk > Reward

Dragonwheel wrote:It isnt 'very rare' to lose all your money. It happens to many people everyday. Nice theory tho

yeah. i did this starting with 500k, made it up too 15m then lost 5 times in a row

Interesting guide! Will try anytime soon

Trevmage wrote:I've already shown how this method fails.

Trevmage wrote:I've hosted 60x2 since February.... and this is called progressive betting. It usually benefits the better. But when it benefits the host, it benefits the host a lot.

If you have 127m and were to bet 1m, 2m, 4m, 8m, 16m, 32m, 64m (I'm doing double-bet instead of triple-bet for simplicity's sake) then this is basically what you would get if the odds are 60x2:


Odds of you winning: 97.51135%
How much you win: 1m

Odds of host winning: 2.48865%
How much host wins: 127m


Let's assume you are going to play until you win 127m from the host:
(97.51135%)^127 = 40.07386%

You have a 40.07386% chance of winning 127m before losing 127m by progressive betting.

Whereas if you just bet 127m once, you have a 41% chance of winning.


/strategy

And also, if you're going to do this in a wager cc instead of an x2 cc, you have to consider commission.

What happens when you bet:
1m (Lose)
2m (Lose)
4m (Lose)
8m (Lose)
16m (Lose)
32m (Win)
When you win the 32m, you must subtract the commission, which leaves you with +25.6m. Now subtract your previous losses (31m in total) you end up losing 5.4m.

Odds are worse for you only if you plan to play until you double entire starting cash no?

DivineOli wrote:Odds are worse for you only if you plan to play until you double entire starting cash no?

Well... if you're only trying to make a little bit of cash with a lot, I suppose this would work *most* of the time.

However, if you have 127m and you're trying to make only 1m profit, you would try this:

Bet 1m
If Lose, Bet 2m
If Lose, Bet 4m
If Lose, Bet 8m
If Lose, Bet 16m
If Lose, Bet 32m
If Lose, Bet 64m
If Lose, you're cleaned.

Now you would expect to probably win 1 of those 7 games. But what if you don't? Each time you attempt to gain 1m with this strategy doing 60x2, there is a 2.489% chance that you will those the entire 127m.

So, you have a 97.511% chance of winning 1m each time.
But do you really want to take the 2.489% chance of losing 127m?

Up to you, but odds are still against you.

Dicing always has risk eventually you would think you would win but you never know it still relies on luck

I've seen 10 lose streaks.

HarroMeTyler wrote:I've seen 10 lose streaks.

I've seen worse, but yes. This is my point, when you get on a lose streak, this strategy wipes out your bank.

EasyMackPro wrote:Dicing always has risk eventually you would think you would win but you never know it still relies on luck

Probability studies = win.

DivineOli wrote:

EasyMackPro wrote:Dicing always has risk eventually you would think you would win but you never know it still relies on luck

Probability studies = win.

Probability studies = "Oh, I guess hosting always has better odds than betting"

Trevmage wrote:

DivineOli wrote:

EasyMackPro wrote:Dicing always has risk eventually you would think you would win but you never know it still relies on luck

Probability studies = win.

Probability studies = "Oh, I guess hosting always has better odds than betting"

YUP lol

this is called martingale betting system
anyways you need large amount of cash
i lost 5 times in a row trying this -.-

bro dicing is all luck. very sorry :/ dude ill try it but in then end. i walk away at like 30m usually. because if not ill get to 150m and then just lose it all!